|
Conclusion
When evolution is taught, students are given
the ideas the scientists think might have worked. They are not presented with
the grave problems as described in this book. If evolution is true, then life
must have had a beginning. The beginning of life is the cell; the simplest cell
is the bacterium.
From a natural origins perspective, how did
the simplest cell organize itself into life? Scientists can easily provide more
than enough of the parts of life and throw them together, but they cannot come
close to creating life--as the Miller experiment and others like it shows. Louis
Pasteur, an 1800’s pioneer in microbiology, demonstrated that life only comes
from life--it does not come from chemicals. Only God can create a living
creature or a human being.
How did usable energy in the cell develop? How
could both photosynthesis and glycolysis happen in one cell without a previous
program from other cells? One of the most insurmountable parts of the issue of
origins is the fact that prior to the first reproducing cell there was no
reproduction. Therefore, one cell could not build on the advances and mistakes
of previous cells. In addition, there was no natural selection or mutations to
help the cell develop usable energy. Natural selection and mutations require
copies, which require reproduction, which requires fully functioning living
cells!
How could DNA, RNA and proteins develop? Each has
immense complexity and organization. As was discussed in Chapter 2, DNA is
information so dense that modern computers are toys in comparison.
 |
DNA, RNA and Proteins
"DNA cannot do its work, including forming more
DNA, without the help of catalytic proteins, or enzymes. In short,
proteins cannot form without DNA, but neither can DNA form without
proteins . . . How did RNA arise initially? RNA and its components are
difficult to synthesize in a laboratory under the best of conditions, much
less under plausible pre-biotic ones."15 |
George Caylor of the Lynchburg Ledger,
while at a bed and breakfast inn, casually interviewed a molecular biologist
named Jeff. Jeff was describing his work as an editor trying to find a spelling
mistake in the DNA. When the topic of information came up, here is what was
said:
"Caylor: ‘How did all that genetic
information get there?’
Jeff: ‘Do you mean, did it just happen? Did it evolve?’
Caylor: ‘Bingo. Do you believe that the
information evolved?’
Jeff: ‘George, nobody I know in my
profession believes it evolved. It was engineered by ‘genius beyond
genius,’ and such information could not have been written any other way.
The paper and ink did not write the book! Knowing what we know, it is
ridiculous to think otherwise.’ "16
Furthermore, how did the cell learn to divide?
It needs over 50 macromolecular components and it, too, cannot benefit from
earlier partial progress or mistakes from the pre-biotic soup. It would have to
have developed the ability to divide in one step, which is scientifically and
logically improbable. To demonstrate that scientists are thinking about the
reproduction problem as well as the need for the cell to have several
simultaneous parts, Stanley Angrist and Loren G. Hepler wrote:
"Directions for the reproduction of
plans, for extraction of energy and chemicals from the environment, for the
growth sequence and the mechanism for translating instructions into growth all
had to be simultaneously present at that moment. This combination of events
has seemed an incredibly unlikely happenstance and often divine intervention
is prescribed as the only way it could have come about."17
|
Boeing 747
The 747 has 4.5 million non-flying parts.
The parts were specially designed, crafted, organized and carefully
assembled. The result is an airplane capable of flying further (8,300 miles)
while carrying more passengers (420) than any other commercial airplane.
Living cells are infinitely more complex than the 747.
|
The first living cell must have had many
complex structures from the beginning. Understanding the concept of life is like
understanding an airplane. The Boeing 747 has 4.5 million non-flying parts. When
the parts are properly put together, the plane can fly. Not all the parts are
essential, but many of them are. Having an engine (also made up of thousands of
non-flying parts) is essential to the 747, but by itself it is useless for
flying. RNA, DNA and proteins are interdependent, just as an airplane must have
an aerodynamic body, wings, propulsion, communications and more for it to fly.
Even if by chance RNA appeared in the pre-biotic soup, it would be useless
without a host of other structures. For what benefit is the RNA or DNA without
usable energy, a plasma membrane, proteins, reproduction and much more to
sustain and propagate the cell?
One can only think that some outside intelligent
source could bring together all these wonderfully complicated systems into a
living cell. In reality, evolution provides no source of intelligence but only
chance, natural processes, luck and time. When evolutionists’ only hope is
extreme faith in the improbable, the origin of the first cell is an irrefutable
argument.
Copyright ©2004 Evidence Press
and its licensors.
It is illegal to copy any material in this book without prior written
permission.
|